Received: from relay3.UU.NET (relay3.UU.NET [192.48.96.8]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id XAA29351 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 23:55:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzusx29678; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 23:54:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA03581; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 23:54:29 -0500
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 23:54:29 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <01HYYHK0IDN6004K5W@UWSTOUT.EDU>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: ED JAKOBER <JAKOBERE@UWSTOUT.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Doing Lightspeed
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>
>>Digital Betacam..Best of the best in the BetaCam family. Digital says
>it ALL
>> Replacing Betacam SP as industry standard.
>
>There is, of course, the new DVC formats, which are digital "prosumer"
>(hate that word) formats. Quality comes very close to Beta, and the
<SNIP>
I kind of doubt it... Sony has NEVER (EVER) produced a "lower end"
recorder that could come near the quality of their "broadcast" machines.
Why would they want to???? I guess I'll wait and see. (have my